The upper figure shows the bootleg series with the term "Blue Cafe 07". Instead date 1973-05-01 (May 1, 1973) from 1973-01-05 (January 5, 1973) was. This is embarrassing.
Die Obere Abbildung zeigt das Bootleg mit der Serienbezeichnung "Blue Cafe 07". Statt das Datum 1973-05-01 (1. Mai 1973) wurde daraus 1973-01-05 (5. Januar 1973). Das ist peinlich.
The two pictures below are part of the series called "Cafe Blue 57". Again, the date is wrong, This time it is not a "spin" but an unusually stupid mistake. Instead of 1975-12-05 is the date printed on the bootleg May 26th 1976th.
"Blue Cafe", as the editor of these two bootlegs, would have to use some sort of care, what's the big deal to find the right data?
Die beiden Bilder unten gehören zum Serienbezeichnung "Blue Cafe 57". Auch hier ist das Datum falsch, Diesmal handelt es sich nicht um einen "Dreher" sondern um einen ungewöhnlich dummen Fehler. Statt 1975-12-05 ist hier auf dem Bootleg das Datum May 26th 1976 abgedruckt.
"Blue Cafe", als Herausgeber dieser beiden Bootlegs, hätte etwas mehr Sorgfalt walten lassen müssen, was ist denn schon dabei, die richtigen Daten herauszufinden?
Commercial bootlegers made many mistakes on their artwork. Often it was on purpose, to help disguise it as a bootleg. Sometimes it was to exploit legal loopholes (an earlier date to claim expiry of copyright, or change of location to take advantage of more liberal regimes). Often also because the bootleger was not very familiar with the material - and as time is money they are not interested in the details, only in selling the product. Fan productions I would expect to be usually pretty accurate. Looking at the copyright warning at the bottom of the last image, I guess perhaps Blue Cafe is profit driven??
It could have presents itself when the first bootleg seriously the question of how it was possible, the Camel one evening a concert in Rotterdam, as well as in California, USA. The counters in Rotterdam has been demonstrated. The exact Encinitas concert took 10 days later, at the place (1976-06-28). I am beginning to lose interest in such artworks.
Es stellt sich bei dem ersten Bootleg ernsthaft die Frage, wie es möglich war, das Camel an einem Abend ein Konzert in Rotterdam sowie in Californien, USA haben konnte. Das Kontert in Rotterdam ist nachgewiesen. Das Encinitas Konzert fand exact 10 Tage später, am statt (1976-06-28). So langsam verliere ich die Lust an solchen Artworks.
This concert is not used. The concert in San Francisco, boarding house was held on this date 1976-06-26
Dieses Konzert ist nicht belegt. Das Konzert in San Francisco, Boardinghouse fand statt zu diesem Termin 1976-06-26
Yes, it may be that the commercial publishers of bootlegs of the reasons you specify an incorrect date on the artwork print
Nevertheless, this way, immensely upset. I like it when details are accurate. If errors creep in error, then this is forgivable, but this increased frequency of false information on the artwork of bootlegs can connect to a system. You've got the suspect as well.
> The concert in San Francisco, boarding house was held on this date 1976-06-26
No Michael in truth it was 23rd June, I have a friend who attended the gig. Moreover Camel played an early show on this date where the encore was Lady Fantasy, while the encore Another Night identifies the radio show as being the evening concert.